9/11 - Fact or Fiction?

I watched an engrossing documentary today - it concerned the 9/11 attacks, and whether or not the story offered to the public by the U.S. government and the media is reliable. The thrust of the doco was that most of the things we've been told about that day either cannot have occurred, or lack any sort of foundation in fact. Radical claims. But they made a very good case for it. Now at this point let me interject and tell you what I am not: I am not a left-wing anti-Bush anti-establishment pro-UN pacifist conspiracy theorist. I am not any one of those things, in fact. No offense to anyone that is. And I'm not a naturally suspicious person (though dint of time has rubbed some cynicism into me). In my perfect world you would not find a single complication, instead, endless complexities; everything would be what it seemed, only much more. However. This Earth is not my perfect world (or anyone else's that I know of. If I find someone like that, remind me to shoot them). To euphemise - stuff happens. And we must keep an open mind. So point by decimating point this documentary calmly and with eyewitness and scientific authority proceeded to tear to quivering ribbons the official version of the story. While they may not have everything right, it is now apparent to me that the mainstream media and the public at large have it very, very wrong. I'll not go into detail here about their specific findings, if you wanted to you could get hold of something similar without much trouble, but in short it claimed that the Trade Center and Pentagon attacks (along with Flight 93) were the product of a carefully orchestrated and meticulously executed plan by the United States government to gain (surprise) power and money. But please don't take my word for it. Look into it yourself, if you're interested. Maybe you'll prove me wrong. Whatever you do, don't say I'm not even going to go there. This is ridiculous anyway; they're just a bunch of conspiracy theorists. Perhaps they are. But what if they're right?